Symbiosis, co-evolution, and relational identity: A holobiont theory of organizational boundaries

Authors

Keywords:

Boundary Permeability, Co-Evolutionary Governance, Holobiont Organization Theory, Relational İdentity, Symbiotic Collaboration

Abstract

Contemporary organizational theory treats boundaries as fixed, jurisdictional, and hierarchically enforced an assumption shared by transaction cost economics, resource dependence theory, and ecosystem frameworks. We argue that this jurisdictional boundary assumption constitutes a fundamental theoretical limitation: it renders boundary permeability theoretically invisible, forecloses a constitutive logic of inter-organizational collaboration, and produces a static conception of organizational identity. To address this gap, we introduce the holobiont a host organism and its symbiotic microbiome functioning as a single co-evolutionary unit as a theoretically generative framework for reconstructing organizational boundaries and collaboration. Drawing on three biological mechanisms constitutive symbiosis, co-evolutionary boundary formation, and emergent identity we develop three formal propositions and identify three boundary conditions under which holobiont logic applies: temporal depth, mutual transformation, and distributed governance. We illustrate the framework's empirical purchase through three paradigmatic cases: the Linux/Apache ecosystem, Toyota's keiretsu supplier network, and biotechnology research consortia. The holobiont framework does not replace existing theories; it identifies the conditions under which they apply and opens new research directions on inter-organizational collaboration, ecosystem governance, and relational organizational identity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58.

Akkaya, B., & Yazıcı, A. M. (2020). Comparing agile leadership with biomimicry-based gray wolf: Proposing a new model. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(2), 1455–1478.

Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263–295.

Anderson, P. (1999). Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216–232.

Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulaz, G. (1999). Swarm intelligence: From natural to artificial systems. Oxford University Press.

Couzin, I. D. (2009). Collective cognition in animal groups. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(1), 36–43.

Dahlander, L., & Magnusson, M. (2008). How do firms make use of open source communities? Long Range Planning, 41(6), 629–649.

Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345–367.

Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.

Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.

Gilbert, S. F., Sapp, J., & Tauber, A. I. (2012). A symbiotic view of life: We have never been individuals. Quarterly Review of Biology, 87(4), 325–341.

Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.

Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business School Press.

Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276.

Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (Eds.). (2017). The SAGE handbook of process organization studies. SAGE.

MacDuffie, J. P. (1995). Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(2), 197–221.

Macneil, I. R. (1980). The new social contract: An inquiry into modern contractual relations. Yale University Press.

Margulis, L. (1991). Symbiosis as a source of evolutionary innovation. In L. Margulis & R. Fester (Eds.), Symbiosis as a source of evolutionary innovation (pp. 1–14). MIT Press.

Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Sage.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.

Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145.

Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2005). Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organization Science, 16(5), 491–508.

Tsoukas, H. (1991). The missing link: A transformational view of metaphors in organizational science. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 566–585.

Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439–465.

Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (T. Parsons, Trans.). Free Press.

West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006). Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Management, 36(3), 319–331.

Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577.

Yazıcı, A. M. (2022). Holographic organizations: Thinking organizations like a brain. International Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 4(2), 102–111.

Yazıcı, A. M. (2023). The business of biomimicry and the wisdom of living organisms. Holistence Publications.

Yazıcı, A. M., & Çiçeklioğlu, H. (2025). The moderating role of environmental ethics in the effect of green innovation awareness on corporate social responsibility. Social Responsibility Journal, 21(4), 826–854.

Yazıcı, A. M., & Öztırak, M. (2024). Big data and amoeba organizations: Innovative management in decision making processes. R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal, 7(4), 519–551.

Yazıcı, A. M., Akdemir Ömür, G., & Askun Celik, D. (2024). Applications and future perspectives of swarm intelligence in unmanned and autonomous systems. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review, 5, 106–130.

Yazıcı, A. M., Öztırak, M., & Bayram, V. (2025). Do digitalization and technological innovation foster the achievement of the sustainable development goals? Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-05-2025-0356

Zilber-Rosenberg, I., & Rosenberg, E. (2008). Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants: The hologenome theory of evolution. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 32(5), 723–735.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-15

How to Cite

Meriç Yazıcı, A. (2026). Symbiosis, co-evolution, and relational identity: A holobiont theory of organizational boundaries. Journal of Entrepreneurial Researchers, 4(2). Retrieved from https://jerhub.org/index.php/jer/article/view/71